Exploring the therapeutic targets of stevioside in management of type 2 diabetes by network pharmacology and in-silico approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of the current study is to investigate the pathways and therapeutic targets linked to stevioside in the management of T2D using computational approaches. We collected RNA-seq datasets from NCBI, then employed GREIN to retrieve differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Computer-assisted techniques DAVID, STRING and NetworkAnalyst were used to explore common significant pathways and therapeutic targets associated with T2D and stevioside. Molecular docking and dynamics simulations were conducted to validate the interaction between stevioside and therapeutic targets. Gene ontology and KEGG analysis revealed that prostaglandin synthesis, IL-17 signaling, inflammatory response, and interleukin signaling were potential pathways targeted by stevioside in T2D. Protein-protein interactions (PPI) analysis identified six common hub proteins ( PPARG , PTGS2 , CXCL8 , CCL2 , PTPRC , and EDN1 ). Molecular docking results showed best binding of stevioside to PPARG (−8 kcal/mol) and PTGS2 (−10.1 kcal/mol). Finally, 100 ns molecular dynamics demonstrated that the binding stability between stevioside and target protein (PPARG and PTGS2) falls within the acceptable range. This study reveals that stevioside exhibits significant potential in controlling T2D by targeting key pathways and stably binding to PPARG and PTGS2 . Further research is necessary to confirm and expand upon these significant computational results. • Pathway analysis revealed stevioside targets prostaglandin synthesis, inflammatory response pathways related to T2D. • PTGS2, CCL2, PTPRC, PPARG, CXCL8, and EDN1 common hub proteins targeted by stevioside were identified. • Molecular docking and dynamics highlight PTGS2 and PPARG as crucial therapeutic targets in the management of T2D.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".