Long-Term Clinical and Sustained REMIssion in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated With Mepolizumab: The REMI-M Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biological therapies, such as mepolizumab, have transformed the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. Although mepolizumab's short-term effectiveness is established, there is limited evidence on its ability to achieve long-term clinical remission. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab, explore its potential to induce clinical and sustained remission, and identify baseline factors associated with the likelihood of achieving remission over 24 months. METHODS: The REMIssion in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated with Mepolizumab (REMI-M) is a retrospective, real-world, multicenter study that analyzed 303 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who received mepolizumab. Clinical, demographic, and safety data were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The most commonly used definitions of clinical remission, which included no exacerbations, no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, and good asthma control with or without assessment of lung function parameters, were assessed. Sustained remission was defined as reaching clinical remission at 12 months and maintaining it until the end of the 24-month period. RESULTS: Clinical remission rates ranged from 28.6% to 43.2% after 12 months and from 26.8% to 52.9% after 24 months based on the different remission definitions. The proportion of patients achieving sustained remission varied between 14.6% and 29%. Factors associated with the likelihood of achieving clinical remission included the presence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease, better lung function at baseline, male sex, absence of anxiety/depression, gastroesophageal reflux disease, bronchiectasis, and reduced OCS consumption. Adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the real-world effectiveness of mepolizumab in achieving clinical remission and sustained remission in severe eosinophilic asthma over 24 months. The identification of distinct factors associated with the likelihood of achieving clinical remission emphasizes the importance of comprehensive management of comorbidities and timely identification of patients who may benefit from biologics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".