MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401931763 · doi:10.35800/jitpt.9.1.2024.53863

Pengaruh kemiringan pada bagian sayap terhadap kelajuan tenggelam tali pemberat alat tangkap pukat cincin

2024· article· en· W4401931763 on OpenAlexaff
Vonny Olgah Rompas, Alfred Luasunaung, Revols D.Ch. Pamikiran, Johnny Budiman, Lawrence J. L. Lumingas, Deiske A. Sumilat, James L. Tumbal

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL ILMU DAN TEKNOLOGI PERIKANAN TANGKAP · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purse seine is a tool (gear) used to catch pelagic fish that form a swarm. As with other fishing gear, a purse seine unit consists of a net, a boat, and auxiliary equipment (rollers, lights, echosounders, and so on). Purse seine is a fishing gear classified in the surrounding net group. Purse seine is also known as a ring trawl because it is equipped with a ring that is used as a place to attach the coloring rope which is very important during the operation of the net. Because the net that was originally bagless will form a pocket at the end of the capture operation. The ring trawl itself has a different name in each region in Indonesia, in North Sulawesi it is known as soma pajeko. There are three technical factors that need to be considered for the success of ring trawl fishing, namely: (1) circular speed, (2) speed and depth of sinking ballast rope, and (3) speed of pulling the choir ropeThe speed of sinking is largely determined by the ballast, the type of material, the size of the thread and the size of the net bit, as well as the ratio of the length of the float rope and the ballast rope. The sinking speed of the ballast rope is calculated based on the relationship between the depth and the sinking time of the ballast rope needed. The speed of the ballast can be increased by increasing the weight of the ballast, but it must be considered because it will increase the tension of the net. Ballast weight per meter ballast ropeBut it should be considered because it will add tension to the net. Greater ballast weight per meter ballast rope will add greater sinking speed. The method used in this study is an experimental method, which is a study that looks for the influence of certain variables on other variables under tightly controlled conditions. The analysis in this study consisted of 4 net models with different slope percentages, namely 57%, 75%, 100% and 125% slopes. The results of the analysis showed that the more tilted the wing with a slope of 57%, 75% and 100%, the more the sinking rate of the ballast rope but for a slope of 125% it does not contribute to the speed of sinking 57% slope at a depth of 5.5 meters the required time is 16.37 seconds, 75% slope at a depth of 5.5 meters is 15.16 seconds, 100% slope at a depth of 5.5 meters the time required is 19.84 seconds and 125% slope the time required at a depth of 5.5 meters is 19.88 seconds. The best sinking speed of the four net models that have been made based on existing data is at 75% slope.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL ILMU DAN TEKNOLOGI PERIKANAN TANGKAPSame topicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations ResearchFrench-language works237,207