MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401934989 · doi:10.55446/ije.2024.1839

Seasonal Incidence of Fall Army Worm <i>Spodoptera Frugiperda</i> (J E Smith) on Maize

2024· article· en· W4401934989 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sangamesh A. Patil, D.R. KADAM, D R Bankar, K.V. Deshmukh, N. V. Parjane

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Entomology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpodopteraBiologyVeterinary medicineFall armywormIncidence (geometry)ToxicologyBotanyMathematicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investigation on seasonal incidence of fall army worm Spodoptera frugiperda on maize was undertaken at the Department of Entomology, VNMKV, Parbhani. The studies were done during kharif on the maize variety Komal. Laval incidence was observed from 31st SMW (Standard Meteorological Week) i.e. fifth week of July and to till 43rd SMW i.e. fourth week of October with a peak incidence observed (4.05 larvae/plant) during 39th SMW. Thereafter larval count showed declining trend (1.9 larvae/plant) during 42nd SMW. Larval infestation also recorded in %age and under observation highest infestation 38.98% during 39th SMW i.e. fourth week of September. The correlation between larval incidence and weather parameters was showed negatively non-significant with minimum temperature, evening relative humidity and rainfall, whereas positive relationship was observed with maximum temperature and bright sunshine hours. The correlation with morning relative humidity evaporation with FAW population wee positively and negativity significant respectively evaporation was negative significant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of EntomologySame topicInsect Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207