MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401938656 · doi:10.1117/12.3018511

Updates to the Maunakea Spectroscopic Explorer: thousands of fibers, infinite possibilities

2024· article· en· W4401938656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew Sheinis, Samuel C. Barden, Windell H. Jones, Greg Barrick, Terence Bauge, Tom Benedict, Greg Green, Marc Baril, Kevin K.W. Ho, Peter M. Frinchaboy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Laser Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAstrobiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MSE is a massively multiplexed spectroscopic survey facility that will replace the Canada-France-Hawaii-Telescope in the coming decade. This 12-m plus telescope, with its 1.5-2.0 square degree field-of-view, will observe 18,720 astronomical targets at every pointing with nominal specifications including: wavelength range equal to 360 nm through 1.8 microns (H-band); low/moderate resolution (R=3,000/7,000) or high resolution (R=30,000). MSE will contribute to nearly every field of astrophysics across all spatial scales, from individual stars to the largest scale structures in the Universe, including (i) the ultimate Gaia follow-up facility for understanding the chemistry and dynamics of the Milky Way, including the outer disk and faint stellar halo (ii) galaxy formation and evolution at cosmic noon, (iii) derivation of the mass of the neutrino and insights into inflationary physics through a cosmological redshift survey that probes a large volume of the Universe. The instrument suite, dedicated to large-scale surveys, will enable MSE to collect massive data, equivalent to a full SDSS Legacy Survey every several weeks. We present an update to the MSE specifications, requirements and technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0450.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy and Laser ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207