MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401942438 · doi:10.1115/gt2024-128128

Performance Analysis of a Self-Decarbonizing Combustor

2024· article· en· W4401942438 on OpenAlexaff
Kartikeya S. Akojwar, Samadhan A. Pawar, Swetaprovo Chaudhuri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Hydrogen is envisioned to be a key decarbonization solution for fossil fuel-dependent power generation and aviation industries. At present, a significant fraction of the generated electrical power is derived from natural gas. As such, the external energy needed for hydrogen generation, often sourced from fossil fuels, results in CO2 emissions, compromising overall carbon neutrality. Instead, the processes of hydrogen generation can be energetically coupled with the combustion process, in-situ, to eliminate external energy requirements. To that end, a novel self-decarbonizing combustor has been conceptualized, integrating methane pyrolysis with the combustion process that can in principle decarbonize many contemporary power generation technologies. The underpinning methane pyrolysis process enables in-situ pre-combustion capture of solid carbon. Consequently, CO2 emissions resulting from the combustion of processed, hydrogen-enriched fuel are mitigated. This study provides a comprehensive analysis, delineating the operating principle and the effect of some of the important governing parameters on the performance of the self-decarbonizing combustor. These parameters including fuel temperature, residence time, pressure, and catalysis are studied in the context of potentially applying the proposed concept to natural gas-based decarbonized electrical power generation. Investigating fuel chemistry, combustion exhaust, carbon structure and morphology under varying process parameters enhances our comprehension of this prospective technology. Additionally, the self-sufficient nature of the system, eliminating the need for separate hydrogen production, storage, and transportation infrastructure, highlights its potential as a scalable and achievable technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207