Leveraging Transformer Models for Anti-Jamming in Heavily Attacked UAV Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, due to their ability to transmit and relay wireless signals in challenging terrains, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and High Altitude Platform Stations (HAPS) have become indispensable in various operations in security, emergency, and military campaigns. However, these networks’ ad-hoc structure and open nature make them highly vulnerable to numerous threats and, in particular, to severe jamming attacks. Furthermore, the communication link between a HAPS and multiple UAVs is also under the threat of multiple and different jamming attacks. Addressing these challenges requires innovative and novel methods capable of interactive and proactive defence strategies. To this end, in this study, we propose a method that combines a pseudo-random (PR) algorithm for initial channel selection with a Transformer-based module to predict jammer behavior. This proactive approach significantly enhances the robustness of UAV communications. Our results demonstrate substantial improvements in transmission success rates and prediction accuracy, offering a robust solution for secure UAV and HAPS communications under adverse conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".