MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401942733 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2024.3447717

FPCA-SETCN: A Novel Deep Learning Framework for Remaining Useful Life Prediction

2024· article· en· W4401942733 on OpenAlexaff
Junde Chen, Yuxin Wen, Xuxue Sun, Adnan Zeb, Mohammad Saleh Meiabadi, Sasan Sattarpanah Karganroudi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accurate prediction of remaining useful life (RUL) can serve as a reliable foundation for equipment maintenance, thereby effectively reducing the incidence of failure and maintenance costs. In this study, a novel deep learning (DL) framework that incorporates functional principal component analysis (FPCA) and enhanced temporal convolutional network (TCN) is proposed for RUL prediction. Precisely, FPCA is employed to capture the changing patterns in multistream degradation trajectories. Subsequently, the reconstructed signals from FPCA are fed into a convolutional block for extracting deep-level features. An enhanced squeeze-and-excitation (ESE) block is then incorporated into the network for adaptive feature recalibration, enhancing the network’s ability to focus on the most relevant information. The framework includes a TCN module augmented with hybrid attention mechanisms, comprising ESE and spatial attention (SA) blocks, to optimally capture forward and backward sequence information of the feature tensor. The efficiency and feasibility of the proposed approach are demonstrated through case studies on both the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation (C-MAPSS) and Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering (CALCE) battery datasets. The proposed method achieves the lowest root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 15.56 on the C-MAPSS dataset and 0.03 on the CALCE dataset. The comparative studies highlight the superiority of the proposed network over existing DL algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Sensors JournalSame topicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207