Automated Assessment of Right Atrial Pressure From Ultrasound Videos Using Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Early recognition of volume overload is essential for heart failure patients. Volume overload can often be easily treated if caught early but causes significant morbidity if unrecognized and allowed to progress. Intravascular volume status can be assessed by ultrasound-based estimation of right atrial pressure (RAP), but the availability of this diagnostic modality is limited by the need for experienced physicians to accurately interpret these scans. Objectives: We sought to evaluate whether machine learning can accurately estimate echocardiogram-measured RAP. Methods: We developed fully automated deep learning models for identifying inferior vena cava scans with rapid inspiration in echocardiogram studies and estimating RAP from those scans. The RAP estimation model was trained and evaluated using 15,828 ultrasound videos of the inferior vena cava and coupled cardiologist-assessed RAP estimates as well as 319 RAP measurements from right heart catheterization. Results: = 0.98) when compared against the gold standard of right heart catheterization RAP measurements in a subset of patients. Our model also generalized well to an external data set of echocardiograms from a different institution (area under the receiver-operating characteristic of 0.854 compared to cardiologist RAP estimates). Conclusions: Machine learning is capable of accurately and robustly interpreting RAP from echocardiogram videos. This algorithm could be used to perform automated assessments of intravascular volume status.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".