On-Substrate Preparation of a Poly(triphenylamino azomethine) for Electrochromic Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An electroactive polyazomethine was prepared directly on a transparent electrode by the polycondensation of bis(triphenylamine) dialdehyde and its complementary methoxytriphenylamine diamine. The spray-and-bake method of coating the electrode for preparing electrochromic layers could be upscaled to prepare working devices larger than standard test devices. The film prepared by thermally annealing the complementary monomers was both electroactive and switched its color with an applied potential. The yellow electrochromic polyazomethine could be electrochemically oxidized reversibly to obtain a blue film. The electrochromic test device fabricated from the polyazomethine was operated upwards of 1 h for performance assessment. The electrochromic response times of the electrochromic device were ca. 3.3 and 1.2 s for the coloration and bleaching, respectively. The upscaled device prepared by the straightforward coating approach had consistent metrics with the small-area test device.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".