The Bloomsbury Handbook of Values and Ethical Change in Transformative Leadership in Higher Education
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<JATS1:p>The Bloomsbury Handbook of Values and Ethical Change in Transformative Leadership in Higher Educationexplores the theoretical and conceptual frameworks which can broaden and deepen an educational leader’s knowledge and skill set related to values and ethical change in times of crises and change.With contributions from five continents, the handbook brings together multi-contextual perspectives to the understanding and application of the theoretical and conceptual models in the field. A broad range of leadership skills and approaches are explored, including collaborative, democratic, learning-centered, transactional, charismatic, transformative, transformational, Stieglerian nootechnologies, agency theory, and network leadership. Countries covered include Australia, Brazil, Canada, Cyprus, India, Italy, Portugal, South Africa, and the UK.</JATS1:p> <JATS1:p>The book forms part of theThe Bloomsbury Handbooks of Crises and Transformative Leadership in Higher Educationcollection,brought together by Mary Drinkwater.</JATS1:p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".