Implementation of the World Health Organization Minimum Dataset for Emergency Medical Teams to Create Disaster Profiles for the Indonesian SATUSEHAT Platform Using Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources: Development and Validation Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The National Disaster Management Agency (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana) handles disaster management in Indonesia as a health cluster by collecting, storing, and reporting information on the state of survivors and their health from various sources during disasters. Data were collected on paper and transferred to Microsoft Excel spreadsheets. These activities are challenging because there are no standards for data collection. The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced a standard for health data collection during disasters for emergency medical teams (EMTs) in the form of a minimum dataset (MDS). Meanwhile, the Ministry of Health of Indonesia launched the SATUSEHAT platform to integrate all electronic medical records in Indonesia based on Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). Objective: This study aims to implement the WHO EMT MDS to create a disaster profile for the SATUSEHAT platform using FHIR. Methods: We extracted variables from 2 EMT MDS medical records-the WHO and Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) versions-and the daily reporting form. We then performed a mapping process to match these variables with the FHIR resources and analyzed the gaps between the variables and base resources. Next, we conducted profiling to see if there were any changes in the selected resources and created extensions to fill the gap using the Forge application. Subsequently, the profile was implemented using an open-source FHIR server. Results: The total numbers of variables extracted from the WHO EMT MDS, ASEAN EMT MDS, and daily reporting forms were 30, 32, and 46, with the percentage of variables matching FHIR resources being 100% (30/30), 97% (31/32), and 85% (39/46), respectively. From the 40 resources available in the FHIR ID core, we used 10, 14, and 9 for the WHO EMT MDS, ASEAN EMT MDS, and daily reporting form, respectively. Based on the gap analysis, we found 4 variables in the daily reporting form that were not covered by the resources. Thus, we created extensions to address this gap. Conclusions: We successfully created a disaster profile that can be used as a disaster case for the SATUSEHAT platform. This profile may standardize health data collection during disasters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".