MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401955787 · doi:10.1061/jaeeez.aseng-5439

Experimental Study of the Periodic Vortex Shedding and Lock-in Region of an NACA4412 Airfoil

2024· article· en· W4401955787 on OpenAlexaff
Niosha Fallahpour, Mahmoud Mani, Mohammad Saeedi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aerospace Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirfoilVortex sheddingVortexLock (firearm)Angle of attackStarting vortexAerospace engineeringPhysicsKármán vortex streetMechanicsEngineeringMarine engineeringAeronauticsAerodynamicsStructural engineeringReynolds numberVortex ringTurbulence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Separated shear layer roll-up over the airfoil suction surface at post-stall incidences leads to harmonic vortex shedding and may damage the body structure if the shedding frequency gets locked into one of the natural frequencies of the body. This article presents the results of a series of wind tunnel tests carried out on a stationary and oscillatory NACA4412 airfoil at an angle of attack (AOA) of 45° and Reynolds numbers Re=1.34×105 and Re=1.52×105 to perform an in-depth investigation of the vortex shedding and lock-in region for an oscillating airfoil in the low subsonic flow regime. Resulting from the semisinusoidal forced pitching motion, the lock-in region in the oscillation’s frequency-amplitude plane was V-shaped, where the vortices shed with the oscillation frequency (lock-in condition) inside the V boundaries. Outside the V boundaries (unlocked conditions), the random shedding of vortices and their interaction causes the kinetic energy scattering in the frequency band limited to the oscillation frequency and the frequency associated with the quasi-steady condition due to the mean angle of attack. Moreover, the aerodynamic damping was examined by calculating the net energy transfer between the body and flow indicated that the direction of the energy transfer between the airfoil’s body and flow is a function of both the oscillation amplitude and frequency, except during oscillation with the resonant frequency at which energy is always transferred from flow to the body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aerospace EngineeringSame topicFluid Dynamics and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207