MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401956104 · doi:10.61409/v09230604

Patients with cancer and pre-existing severe mental disorder

2024· review· en· W4401956104 on OpenAlexaff
Louise Elkjær Fløe, Astrid Næraa Høeg Vendelsøe, Lars Henrik Jensen, Mette Stie, Peter Hjorth, Jens Søndergaard, Anna Mygind, Poul Videbech, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Terese Myhre Bentson, Josefine Maria Bruun, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard

Bibliographic record

VenueUgeskrift for Læger · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsBASF (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychiatryBipolar disorderLife expectancyComorbidityPsychological interventionDepression (economics)Economic shortageSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)MedicineMental healthCancerHealth careMental healthcareHealthcare systemGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with cancer and pre-existing severe mental disorder, which include moderate to severe depression, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, are known to have reduced life expectancy and are less likely to get recommended cancer treatment. Barriers at patient-, provider- and system level have been identified, e.g. lack of identification of psychiatric comorbidity, shortage of stabilising psychiatric symptoms and fragmentation of the healthcare system. Patient-centered, interdisciplinary and cross-sectorial healthcare interventions have shown a high potential to improve the cancer care, as argued in this review.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUgeskrift for LægerSame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207