MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401959995 · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2024.100879

Sports betting scandals highlight knowledge gaps for gambling harm

2024· article· en· W4401959995 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luke Clark, Michael J. A. Wohl

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Regional Health - Americas · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGambling Behavior and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmPsychologyCriminologyAdvertisingBusinessSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent months, high-profile scandals in North American professional sports have amplified concerns over how the legalization and expansion of sports betting has impacted the integrity of sport. In Major League Baseball (MLB), Los Angeles Dodgers player Shohei Ohtani's former interpreter has plead guilty to bank fraud for stealing nearly 17 million from Ohtani's bank account to finance illegal sports betting activities.1 Ohtani denies any involvement in the scandal. In another case, Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter has been handed a lifetime ban by the National Basketball Association (NBA) for violating league gambling rules,2 including disclosing confidential information to sports bettors and betting on NBA games.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.296
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Regional Health - AmericasSame topicGambling Behavior and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207