MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401963970 · doi:10.1007/s40200-024-01491-7

Predictive modelling of metabolic syndrome in Ghanaian diabetic patients: an ensemble machine learning approach

2024· article· en· W4401963970 on OpenAlexaff
Emmanuel Acheampong, Eric Adua, Christian Obirikorang, Enoch Odame Anto, Emmanuel Peprah‐Yamoah, Yaa Obirikorang, Evans Asamoah Adu, Victor Opoku‐Yamoah, Michael Nyantakyi, John Taylor, Tonnies Abeku Buckman, Maryam Yakubu, Ebenezer Afrifa‐Yamoah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersEdith Cowan University
KeywordsMetabolic syndromeEnsemble learningMachine learningArtificial intelligenceDiabetes mellitusComputer scienceMedicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The burgeoning prevalence of cardiometabolic disorders, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) within Africa is concerning. Machine learning (ML) techniques offer a unique opportunity to leverage data-driven insights and construct predictive models for MetS risk, thereby enhancing the implementation of personalised prevention strategies. In this work, we employed ML techniques to develop predictive models for pre-MetS and MetS among diabetic patients. Methods: This multi-centre cross-sectional study comprised of 919 T2DM patients. Age, gender, novel anthropometric indices along with biochemical measures were analysed using BORUTA feature selection and an ensemble majority voting classification model, which included logistic regression, k-nearest neighbour, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Gradient boosting classification, and support vector machine. Results: Distinct metabolic profiles and phenotype clusters were associated with MetS progression. The BORUTA algorithm identified 10 and 16 significant features for pre-MetS and MetS prediction, respectively. For pre-MetS, the top-ranked features were lipid accumulation product (LAP), triglyceride-glucose index adjusted for waist-to-height ratio (TyG-WHtR), coronary risk (CR), visceral adiposity index (VAI) and abdominal volume index (AVI). For MetS prediction, the most influential features were VAI, LAP, waist triglyceride index (WTI), Very low-density cholesterol (VLDLC) and TyG-WHtR. Majority voting ensemble classifier demonstrated superior performance in predicting pre-MetS (AUC = 0.79) and MetS (AUC = 0.87). Conclusion: Identifying these risk factors reveals the complex interplay between visceral adiposity and metabolic dysregulation in African populations, enabling early detection and treatment. Ethical integration of ML algorithms in clinical decision-making can streamline identification of high-risk individuals, optimize resource allocation, and enable precise, tailored interventions. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-024-01491-7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Diabetes & Metabolic DisordersSame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207