MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401967405 · doi:10.26689/pbes.v7i4.8075

Layoff Factors Analysis: Evidence from 2021 China General Social Survey

2024· article· en· W4401967405 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Ji, Chongtao Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of Business and Economic Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLayoffEndogeneityInstrumental variableMultivariate probit modelEconomicsProbitAffect (linguistics)Ordered probitProbit modelChinaDemographic economicsSurvey data collectionWork (physics)Labour economicsEconometricsPolitical sciencePsychologyEconomic growthUnemployment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper analyzes factors that explain company layoffs, given the individual layoff data in 2021, China. Using the Probit regression model, we find that gender inequality exists in layoffs, an employee’s work experience becomes less critical in the company’s layoff decisions, and how an employee’s health reasons affect work affects its probability of being laid off. Since we consider a significant endogeneity issue with education, using parents’ education as an instrumental variable suggests that political status cannot be a significant advantage for employees to lower the chance of being laid off. Moreover, evidence implies that policymakers encouraging the pursuit of higher educational degrees can foster stability in the labor market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of Business and Economic StudiesSame topicEmployment and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207