Topology optimization of adaptive sandwich plates with magnetorheological core layer for improved vibration attenuation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study the optimum topology distribution of the magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) layer in an adaptive sandwich plate is investigated. The adaptive sandwich plate consists of an MR elastomer layer embedded between two thin elastic plates. A finite element model has been first formulated to derive the governing equations of motion. A design optimization methodology incorporating the developed finite element model has been subsequently developed to identify the optimum topology treatment of the MR layer to enhance the vibration control in wide-band frequency range. For this purpose, the dynamic compliance and density of each element are defined as the objective function and design variables in the optimization problem, respectively. The method of the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP), is extended for material properties interpolation leading to a new MRE-based penalization (MREP) model. Method of moving asymptotes (MMA) has been subsequently utilized to solve the optimization problem. The developed finite element model and design optimization method are first validated using benchmark problems. The proposed design optimization methodology is then effectively utilized to investigate the optimal topologies of the magnetorheological elastomer (MRE) core layer in MRE-based sandwich plates under various boundary and loading conditions. Results show the effectiveness of the proposed design optimization methodology for topology optimization of MRE-based sandwich panels to mitigate the vibration in wide range of frequencies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".