MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401972040 · doi:10.36341/psi.v8i1.4888

Peran Religiositas terhadap Quarter-Life Crisis pada Dewasa Awal

2024· article· en· W4401972040 on OpenAlex
Ardian Adi Putra, Itto Nesyia Nasution, Dina Arsita

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychopolytan Jurnal Psikologi · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReligiosityQuarter (Canadian coin)PsychologyNonprobability samplingProbability samplingSurvey researchDemographySocial psychologyPopulationSociologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Quarter-life crisis is a crisis in early adulthood, where individuals fear the direction of life, such as careers, find out who they are, relationships, and social life. One of the factors that can affect a quarter-life crisis is religiosity. This study aims to see the relationship between religiosity and quarter-life crisis in early adulthood in Pekanbaru City. This research is correlational quantitative. Subjects in this study were 225 people (64 men and 161 women) in Pekanbaru with an age range of 18-37 years who were taken using purposive sampling technique with the characteristic of early adulthood who are Muslim. Data were collected using two scales, the religiosity scale, and the scale quarter-life crisis. The results in this study indicate a negative relationship between religiosity and quarter-life crisis in early adulthood in Pekanbaru with Sig. of 0.002 and the correlation coefficient of (r) = -0.201 means that high or low religiosity has a correlation with the quarter-life crisis, thus the research hypothesis is accepted.Based on the results of this research, appropriate interventions are needed to increase religiosity so that it can have a positive impact on the quarter-life crisis in early adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it