Peran Religiositas terhadap Quarter-Life Crisis pada Dewasa Awal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Quarter-life crisis is a crisis in early adulthood, where individuals fear the direction of life, such as careers, find out who they are, relationships, and social life. One of the factors that can affect a quarter-life crisis is religiosity. This study aims to see the relationship between religiosity and quarter-life crisis in early adulthood in Pekanbaru City. This research is correlational quantitative. Subjects in this study were 225 people (64 men and 161 women) in Pekanbaru with an age range of 18-37 years who were taken using purposive sampling technique with the characteristic of early adulthood who are Muslim. Data were collected using two scales, the religiosity scale, and the scale quarter-life crisis. The results in this study indicate a negative relationship between religiosity and quarter-life crisis in early adulthood in Pekanbaru with Sig. of 0.002 and the correlation coefficient of (r) = -0.201 means that high or low religiosity has a correlation with the quarter-life crisis, thus the research hypothesis is accepted.Based on the results of this research, appropriate interventions are needed to increase religiosity so that it can have a positive impact on the quarter-life crisis in early adulthood.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".