MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401973055 · doi:10.1080/1070289x.2024.2390314

Being anti-racist as ceremonial journey: from and within reflective learning stories

2024· article· en· W4401973055 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIdentities · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Race Theory in Education
Canadian institutionsSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilUniversity of Regina
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVisual artsPsychologyAestheticsSociologyHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores the concept of being anti-racist as a ceremonial journey, using anti-racist reflective learning as its research framework. It examines my transformative journey as a racialized immigrant woman scholar by reflecting on personal experiences and engaging with community narratives. Through an anti-racist lens, the study highlights the importance of creating intercultural spaces for authentic engagement and mutual learning. By centring anti-racist learning experiences, the paper underscores my efforts to confront racism and foster social justice. Through critical reflection and communal dialogue, individuals navigate the complexities of racial consciousness, fostering empathy, solidarity, and personal growth. This paper argues that being anti-racist is not merely a personal endeavour but a collective journey towards equity and liberation, rooted in reflective learning and community engagement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it