MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401976469 · doi:10.1093/ijrl/eeae025

Cosmopolitan Pariahs: The Moral Rationale for Exclusion under Article 1F

2024· article· en· W4401976469 on OpenAlexaff
Colin Grey

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Refugee Law · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article reconstructs the moral rationale for exclusion under article 1F of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees. The idea that certain refugees may be ‘undeserving’ of refugee protection because of past criminality is incompatible with a reading of the international refugee law regime as a human rights regime. Instead, the best reconstruction of exclusion’s moral rationale is to construe it as a non-punitive form of blame, under which the international community withdraws the beneficence and goodwill necessary to enter into thicker relations of shared residence and potential citizenship. Some troubling implications of this construal of exclusion are briefly explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.040
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0080.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Refugee LawSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207