MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401976660 · doi:10.1093/comjnl/bxae055

Approximation algorithms for maximum weighted internal spanning trees in regular graphs and subdivisions of graphs

2024· article· en· W4401976660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Computer Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpanning treeSubdivisionComputer scienceAlgorithmCombinatoricsMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Let $G$ be a vertex-weighted connected graph of $n$ vertices and let $T$ be a spanning tree of $G$. We call $T$ a maximum weighted internal spanning tree of $G$ if the sum of the weights of the internal vertices of $T$ is the maximum over all spanning trees of $G$. The maximum weighted internal spanning tree (MaxwIST) problem asks to find such a spanning tree $T$ of $G$. The problem is NP-hard. We give an $O(dn)$ time approximation algorithm for $d$-regular graphs of $n=|V|$ vertices that computes a spanning tree with total weight of the internal vertices is at least $\frac{\beta _{d}}{\beta _{d} +d-2} - \epsilon $ of the total weight of all the vertices of the graph for any $\epsilon>0$, where $\beta _{d} = (d-1)H_{d-1}$, and $H_{d-1} = \sum _{i=1}^{d-1} i^{-1}$ is the $(d-1)$th harmonic number. For every $d \geq 3$ and $n_{0} \geq 1$, we show the construction of a $d$-regular graph of at least $n_{0}$ vertices, such that for any of its spanning trees, $\frac{w(I)}{w(V)}\le \frac{d}{d+1}$ holds. We give an $O(dn)$ time approximation algorithm for subdivisions of $d$-regular graphs, where the ratio of the internal weight of the spanning tree with the total vertex weight of the graph is at least $\frac{d-1}{2d-3} - \epsilon $ for $\epsilon>0$. We extend our study to $x$-subdivisions of Hamiltonian and hypoHamiltonian graphs, where each edge of the original Hamiltonian or hypoHamiltonian graph has been subdivided at least $x$ times. For those two graph classes, we show that there exists a spanning tree with internal vertex weight at least $1-\frac{2}{x-1}$ of the total vertex weight of the graph. Furthermore, we give $O(n)$ time algorithm for $x$-subdivisions of biconnected outerplanar graphs and $4$-connected planar graphs to achieve the above bound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it