MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401982116 · doi:10.54194/kjry1417

Benefit of expedited regulatory approval for oncology drugs eliminated by slow reimbursement reviews and price negotiations

2024· article· en· W4401982116 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Nigel S. B. Rawson, David J. Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Health Policy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicPharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReimbursementNegotiationDrug approvalBusinessPharmacologyMedicinePolitical scienceLawDrug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Benefit of expedited regulatory approval for oncology drugs eliminated by slow reimbursement reviews and price negotiations Nigel S B Rawson and David J Stewart ABSTRACT Summary: In an examination of 92 oncology drugs that received regulatory approval

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.104
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.263
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1040.263
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0070.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0140.006
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0160.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Health PolicySame topicPharmaceutical Economics and PolicyFrench-language works237,207