An electroporation cytometry system for long-term, live cell cycle analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electric fields are used in biology to address a broad range of questions and through a variety of techniques, including electroporation, gene electrotransfer (GET), electrostimulation (ES), and electrochemotherapy. Each of these modalities requires specific conditions and has drastically different target outcomes on the cell. ES has demonstrated that non-pore forming electric fields alter cell cycle progression. However, pore forming electric fields such as with GET have not been as widely explored despite major clinical advancements. Additionally, the real-time visual analysis of electrical field effects on mammalian cell culture is currently lacking among most commercial systems. To facilitate investigations into these research areas, an electroporation cytometry system was developed including a custom chamber compatible with live cell imaging and exponential decay pulse generator for live cell analysis. The functionality of the system was demonstrated using a recombinant cell line using U-2 OS cells and FUCCI(CA)5 cell cycle reporter. The exposure of the cells to a 180 V pulse in both unsynchronized and synchronized populations revealed an effect on the cell cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it