MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4401990917 · doi:10.1109/tce.2024.3383608

Guest Editorial Data-Driven Innovation and Adversarial Learning Models for Industry 5.0 Toward Consumer Digital Ecosystems

2024· editorial· en· W4401990917 on OpenAlex
Arun Kumar Sangaiah, Xizhao Wang, Mohammad S. Obaidat, Patrick C. K. Huang, Kannan Govindan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdversarial systemComputer scienceBusinessData scienceTelecommunicationsKnowledge managementArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the integration of advanced technologies such as communication advancements (e.g., 5G), Artificial Intelligence (AI), industrial edge computing, and adversarial Machine Learning (ML) has accelerated the evolution of Industry 5.0 systems, shaping digital ecosystems for consumers. This convergence of technologies holds promise for addressing the service requirements and cybersecurity strategies essential for Industry 5.0 systems within digital ecosystems. Industry 5.0, the fifth industrial revolution, represents a paradigm shift integrating digital ecosystems and emerging technologies like the Internet of Things (IoT), Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), cloud computing, and AI. These technologies converge to establish intelligent, open, and secure factories, revolutionizing industrial automation and manufacturing processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it