Language-Guided Zero-Shot Object Counting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, the Class-Agnostic Counting (CAC) problem has garnered increasing attention owing to its intriguing generality and superior efficiency compared to Category-Specific Counting (CSC). This paper proposes a novel ExpressCount to enhance zero-shot object counting via deep language-guided learning. Specifically, the ExpressCount is comprised of an innovative Language-oriented Exemplar Perceptron and a downstream visual Zero-shot Counting pipeline. There-into, the perceptron hammers at exploiting exemplar cues from language-vision signals by inheriting rich semantic priors from the pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs), whereas the counting pipeline excels in mining fine-grained features through dual-branch and cross-attention schemes, contributing to the high-quality similarity learning. Apart from building a bridge between the LLM in vogue and the visual counting tasks, expression-guided exemplar estimation advances zero-shot learning capabilities for counting instances with arbitrary classes. Moreover, devising a FSC-147-Express with annotations of meticulous linguistic expressions pioneers a new venue for developing and validating language-based counting models. Extensive experiments demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of our ExpressCount, even showcasing the accuracy on par with partial CSC models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".