Groundtruthing nitrogen isotopes as a symbiosis proxy using the facultatively symbiotic coral Oculina arbuscula
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The resilience of coral reefs in oligotrophic, (sub)tropical oceans is largely due to the symbiotic relationship between scleractinian corals and Symbiodiniaceae algae, which enables efficient internal nutrient recycling. Investigating the history of this coral symbiosis can provide insights into its role in sustaining the health of both present and future coral reefs. The isotopic composition of organic nitrogen (15N/14N or δ15N) bound within coral skeletons has been utilized to trace the existence of symbiosis in fossil corals, suggesting that coral symbiosis dates back to at least 210 million years ago. The basis of this proxy is that symbiotic corals are expected to exhibit lower δ15N compared to their non-symbiotic (aposymbiotic) counterparts within the same environments, owing to internal nitrogen recycling between the coral host and algal symbiont, and reduced leakage of low-δ15N ammonium into seawater. However, this hypothesis has not been adequately tested in contemporary settings. In a laboratory experiment, we examined the δ15N differences between the symbiotic and aposymbiotic branches within the same genetic backgrounds of the facultatively symbiotic coral Oculina arbuscula under well-fed conditions. Across five different genotypes in two separate experiments, symbiotic branches consistently showed lower δ15N than their aposymbiotic counterparts. These findings corroborate the use of δ15N as a proxy for identifying coral symbiosis in the past, particularly when multiple species of corals coexisted in the same environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".