Twinned neuroimaging analysis contributes to improving the classification of young people with autism spectrum disorder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is diagnosed using comprehensive behavioral information. Neuroimaging offers additional information but lacks clinical utility for diagnosis. This study investigates whether multi-forms of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast can be used individually and in combination to produce a categorical classification of young individuals with ASD. MRI data were accessed from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE). Young participants (ages 2-30) were selected, and two group cohorts consisted of 702 participants: 351 ASD and 351 controls. Image-based classification was performed using one-channel and two-channel inputs to 3D-DenseNet deep learning networks. The models were trained and tested using tenfold cross-validation. Two-channel models were twinned with combinations of structural MRI (sMRI) maps and amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) or fractional ALFF (fALFF) maps from resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI). All models produced classification accuracy that exceeded 65.1%. The two-channel ALFF-sMRI model achieved the highest mean accuracy of 76.9% ± 2.34. The one-channel ALFF-based model alone had mean accuracy of 72% ± 3.1. This study leveraged the ABIDE dataset to produce ASD classification results that are comparable and/or exceed literature values. The deep learning approach was conducive to diverse neuroimaging inputs. Findings reveal that the ALFF-sMRI two-channel model outperformed all others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".