A Novel Deep Learning Model for Breast Tumor Ultrasound Image Classification with Lesion Region Perception
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multi-task learning (MTL) methods are widely applied in breast imaging for lesion area perception and classification to assist in breast cancer diagnosis and personalized treatment. A typical paradigm of MTL is the shared-backbone network architecture, which can lead to information sharing conflicts and result in the decline or even failure of the main task's performance. Therefore, extracting richer lesion features and alleviating information-sharing conflicts has become a significant challenge for breast cancer classification. This study proposes a novel Multi-Feature Fusion Multi-Task (MFFMT) model to effectively address this issue. Firstly, in order to better capture the local and global feature relationships of lesion areas, a Contextual Lesion Enhancement Perception (CLEP) module is designed, which integrates channel attention mechanisms with detailed spatial positional information to extract more comprehensive lesion feature information. Secondly, a novel Multi-Feature Fusion (MFF) module is presented. The MFF module effectively extracts differential features that distinguish between lesion-specific characteristics and the semantic features used for tumor classification, and enhances the common feature information of them as well. Experimental results on two public breast ultrasound imaging datasets validate the effectiveness of our proposed method. Additionally, a comprehensive study on the impact of various factors on the model's performance is conducted to gain a deeper understanding of the working mechanism of the proposed framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".