A new model for fuel consumption and route time computations – a case study in the Quebec forest industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In forest transportation in Quebec, transportation rates are typically based on an estimated trip or travel time duration during which a truck travels loaded from an origin to a destination and then returns empty to the origin. These transportation rates implicitly consider fuel consumption for fuel surcharge costs in negotiation, but for most shippers and carriers, fuel consumption remains a rough estimate, leading to underestimation or overestimation of actual consumption. In this paper, we propose a new fuel consumption model and a more detailed trip time computation to support accurate estimations. The model takes into account road network characteristics that affect fuel consumption, such as road elevation profiles, including slopes that significantly affect fuel consumption compared to flat roads, and curves where trucks change speed, as well as intersections where trucks need to stop or slow down. The road network of the province of Quebec (Canada) is represented in a route network that integrates all the characteristics considered by the fuel consumption model. The model is validated in a case study using a timber truck equipped with GPS and information about overall fuel consumption between a set of refueling points. Utilizing the fuel consumption model and a route planner enables accurate estimation of fuel consumption and, consequently, associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and travel times. A case study involving three companies is then conducted to analyze how more detailed information can inform new transportation rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".