The Domestication of Pumpkins: Historical Perspectives and Modern Genetic Evidence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The domestication of pumpkins (Cucurbita spp.) has a rich history that spans thousands of years, originating in the Americas and spreading globally.Understanding the genetic and evolutionary pathways of these crops provides insights into their domestication processes and the genetic diversity that has been shaped over millennia.This study synthesizes historical perspectives and modern genetic evidence to elucidate the domestication history of pumpkins, focusing on the genetic relationships between wild and domesticated species, and the impact of domestication on genetic diversity.Phylogenetic studies have revealed complex relationships among Cucurbita species, identifying novel connections and clarifying the genetic origins of domesticated taxa.Genomic analyses have uncovered structural variants and candidate domestication genes involved in growth regulation, plant defense, and seed development.Evidence suggests that domestication bottlenecks and gene flow between wild and domesticated subspecies have played significant roles in shaping genetic diversity.Additionally, the integration of archaeological and genomic data has provided a comprehensive understanding of the domestication timeline and the traits selected during early cultivation.The findings highlight the intricate genetic and evolutionary processes underlying pumpkin domestication.The identification of key genetic variants and the role of gene flow offer valuable insights for future breeding programs aimed at enhancing crop resilience and quality.Continued research integrating genomic and archaeological data is essential for a deeper understanding of the domestication and evolution of Cucurbita species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".