MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402025883 · doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2024.122366

A review of the major chemical and isotopic characteristics of groundwater in crystalline rocks of the Canadian Shield

2024· review· en· W4402025883 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Lamine Boumaiza, Randy L. Stotler, Shaun K. Frape

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Geology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGroundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNuclear Waste Management Organization
KeywordsGeologyGroundwaterShieldGeochemistryEarth scienceMining engineeringPetrologyGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian Shield groundwater characterization studies have been conducted over the last four decades through operating mines, underground research areas, and wells installed for a variety of purposes. A newly available database containing chemical and isotopic analytical results of groundwaters includes data from all of these sources and spans the Canadian Shield. The Precambrian Canadian Shield Groundwater and Gas Geochemistry (PCSG 3 ) database provides the most comprehensive data of groundwater chemistry in the Canadian Shield region to date. In this initial review of the PCSG 3 database, major ion, Br, water type, δ 18 O, δ 2 H and 3 H trends with depth and salinity are described. In future reviews, other aspects of the database will be examined, including minor and trace elements, other isotopes, and gases. The PCSG 3 database is comprised of 69 % freshwaters, mostly found at depths <1000 m, and dominated by Ca-HCO 3 and Na-HCO 3 water types; 17 % brackish waters, at depths <2000 m, and dominated by Na Cl, Ca Cl, Ca-HCO 3 , and Ca-SO 4 water types; 9 % saline waters, mostly at depths >1000 m, and dominated by Ca Cl, Na Cl, Ca-HCO 3 , and Na-HCO 3 water types; and 4 % brine samples, identified at depths up to 1800 m, composed entirely of Ca Cl water types. An increase in all major ion and Br concentrations with depth is observed, except for HCO 3 , with groundwaters typically becoming more saline with depth. Variability in salinities at specific depths and at individual sites across the Canadian Shield reflect the effect of (primarily) anthropogenically induced mixing, although heterogeneous geology and hydrogeologic flow paths are also important. When eliminating data that are likely affected by anthropogenically-induced mixing, saline waters are the most affected, with median depths of Na Cl and Ca Cl type waters shifting downward, and median concentrations of Na Cl type waters increasing. The isotopic data indicate that groundwaters from across the Canadian Shield reflect a variety of water recharge sources, with many samples plotting along the Global Meteoric Water Line (GMWL). Deviations to the right of the GMWL are indicative of freezing and mixing with drill fluid, while deviations to the left are indicative of isotopic exchange between water and rock and/or silicate hydration over long time scales. Rock/silicate-water interactions over hundreds of million of years resulted in development and isolation of Ca Cl brines at multiple locations. Cold climate processes, including glacial meltwater recharge and/or ionic concentration during permafrost formation, yielded a third end-member. A conceptual model of the expected groundwater chemistry variation with depth across the Canadian Shield is presented based on an evaluation of the variation of water type and salinity with depth. This model shows that groundwater chemistry changes from shallow groundwater dominated by Ca,Na-HCO 3 to deep groundwater dominated by Ca Cl, and details intermediate water type and TDS variations with depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical GeologySame topicGroundwater and Isotope GeochemistryFrench-language works237,207