A data-driven dynamic method of downhole rock characterisation for the vibro-impact drilling system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
For the real-time characterisation of an inhomogeneous impact inhibiting constraint such as downhole rock layers, an unconventional method using machine learning (ML) and drill-bit vibrations is investigated. An impact oscillator with one-sided elastic constraint is employed in modelling the bit-rock impact actions. Measurable drill-bit dynamics, such as acceleration, were acquired and processed into features and 2D-images that were later used in developing ML models capable of predicting the stiffness of impacted rock constraint. Explored ML networks include Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory Network. Both simulation and experimental studies have been presented to validate the proposed method while using coefficient of determination ( R 2 ) and normalised mean absolute error (NMAE) as the performance metrics of the ML models. Results showed that the feature-based models had better performances for both simulation and experiment compared to the raw signal and 2D-image based models. Aside being simple and computationally less expensive, the feature-based MLP models outperformed other models having R 2 values > 0.7 and NMAE values < 0.2 for both simulation and experiment, thus presenting them as the preferred ML model for dynamic downhole rock characterisation. In general, this study presents a new modality to achieving logging-while-drilling during deep-hole drilling operations such as carried out in hydrocarbon, mineral and geothermal exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".