MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402027007 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.110.024907

Evolution equation for the energy-momentum moments of the nonequilibrium density function and regularized relativistic third-order hydrodynamics

2024· article· en· W4402027007 on OpenAlexafffund
Dasen Ye, Sangyong Jeon, Charles Gale

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsPhysicsEnergy–momentum relationMomentum (technical analysis)Quantum electrodynamicsOrder (exchange)Function (biology)Third orderClassical mechanicsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we first derive the evolution equation for the general energy-momentum moment of $\ensuremath{\delta}f$, where $\ensuremath{\delta}f$ is the deviation from the local equilibrium phase-space density. We then introduce a relativistic extension of regularized hydrodynamics developed in the nonrelativistic case by Struchtrup and Torrilhon that judiciously mixes the method of moments and Chapman-Enskog expansion. Hydrodynamic equations up to the third-order in gradients are then systematically derived within the context of a single species system and the relaxation-time approximation. This is followed by a series of linear stability and causality analysis. For the massless particles without any charge conservation, the third-order hydrodynamics is shown to be linearly stable and causal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicHigh-Energy Particle Collisions ResearchFrench-language works237,207