MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402027393 · doi:10.1117/12.3019093

Silicon photonic aperture synthesis for long baseline near-infrared interferometry

2024· article· en· W4402027393 on OpenAlexaff
Ross Cheriton, Volodymyr Artyshchuk, Erin M. Tonita, Glen Herriot, Brent Carlson, Thushara Gunaratne, Zoran Ljusic, Alexis Hill, Jean‐Pierre Véran, John Weber, Jianhao Zhang, Maziyar Milanizadeh, M. Saad Bin-Alam, Jens H. Schmid, Dan‐Xia Xu, Pavel Cheben, Siegfried Janz

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferometrySilicon photonicsSiliconPhotonicsBaseline (sea)InfraredOpticsMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For Very Long Baseline Interferometry high-resolution imaging of exoplanets, an astrophotonic-based aperture synthesis concept is proposed for high-resolution direct imaging of exoplanets. A silicon photonic chip incorporates microheaters and optical phase shifters for precise control of delays and phase synchronization from widely separated receivers. A satellite laser guide star with a modulated optical signal serves as a global phase reference, enabling high-speed, high-stroke phase compensation and combining. The chip's design addresses challenges such as atmospheric turbulence and phase stability in optical frequencies. The study outlines the current proof-of-concept instrument status, measured performance, chip fabrication, and routes towards photonics-enabled exoplanet imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→