Blockchain Based Reverse Logistics Data Tracking: An Innovative Approach to Enhance E - Waste Recycling Efficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the application of blockchain technology in e-waste recycling, focusing on enhancing reverse logistics data tracking. A blockchain-based system integrating IoT sensors, smart contracts, and a token-based incentive mechanism was designed and implemented. The case study in Metropolis demonstrated significant improvements in e-waste management efficiency. Recycling rates increased by 27%, material recovery efficiency improved by 18%, and stakeholder participation doubled. The system processed an average of 50,000 transactions daily, proving its scalability. The blockchain implementation addressed key challenges in e-waste management, including lack of transparency and inefficient processes. The immutable audit trail enhanced traceability, fostering trust among participants. The token-based incentive system drove behavioral changes, increasing consumer participation by 119%. The study contributes to the theoretical understanding of blockchain applications in environmental management and extends literature on reverse logistics. Practical implications include a blueprint for implementing blockchain-based e-waste management systems, insights for policymakers, and opportunities for technology developers. The research demonstrates blockchain's potential to address environmental challenges, offering a promising path towards sustainable resource management practices. Future research directions include exploring cross-border e-waste management and integrating artificial intelligence for predictive analytics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".