MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402028782 · doi:10.17615/wwvt-4698

Ab initio studies of the double–Gamow-Teller transition and its correlation with neutrinoless double-β decay

2024· article· en· W4402028782 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. D. Holt, I. Ginnett, A. Belley, J. Engel, J. M. Yao, S. R. Stroberg, S. Bogner, R. Wirth, H. Hergert, T. Miyagi

Bibliographic record

VenueUNC Libraries · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityOffice of ScienceDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterSun Yat-sen UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCompute CanadaTRIUMFMichigan State UniversityU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsDouble beta decayPhysicsAb initioNuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsNeutrino

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We use chiral interactions and several ab initio methods to compute the nuclear matrix elements (NMEs) for ground-state-to-ground-state double Gamow-Teller transitions in a range of isotopes and explore the correlation of these NMEs with those for neutrinoless double beta decay produced by the exchange of a light Majorana neutrino. When all the NMEs of both isospin-conserving and isospin-changing transitions from the ab initio calculations are considered, the correlation is strong. For the experimentally relevant isospin-changing transitions by themselves, however, the correlation is weaker and may not be helpful for reducing the uncertainty in the NMEs for neutrinoless double beta decay.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNC LibrariesSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207