MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402028936 · doi:10.1103/physreva.110.023517

Phase dependence of Kerr-based parametric amplification

2024· article· en· W4402028936 on OpenAlexafffund
Nathan G. Drouillard, T. J. Hammond

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsSupercontinuumChirpChirped pulse amplificationUltrashort pulseOpticsDispersion (optics)Self-phase modulationPulse (music)PhysicsInstabilityBandwidth (computing)Bandwidth-limited pulsePulse compressionLaserNonlinear opticsWavelengthTelecommunicationsPhotonic-crystal fiberComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kerr instability amplification can amplify over an octave of spectrum, a broad bandwidth supporting few-cycle pulses. However, dispersion management in this regime is crucial, and we explore the parameters required to maintain the ultrashort pulse undergoing amplification. At low pump intensities, we experimentally observe an interference between the strongly chirped supercontinuum seed and weakly amplified pulse, reproduced in our model by manipulating the seed dispersion. Extending our model to cases of high gain, our simulation predicts the dispersion is near zero, and the phase can be compensated preamplification to generate near-transform-limited amplified few-cycle pulses. We discuss chirping the seed pulse to avoid saturation, a route for generating sub-mJ few-cycle pulses in a single stage from Kerr instability chirped-pulse amplification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207