Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several different oesophageal lesions may have a polypoid appearance. These include true neoplasms, both benign and malignant, as well as tumour-like lesions. Inflammatory/hyperplastic polyps are so-called as these polyps typically have a combination of hyperplastic epithelium and inflammation. Inflamed, immature-appearing squamous epithelium may show pseudo-epitheliomatous hyperplasia and regenerative cytological atypia, mimicking squamous-cell carcinoma. Inflammatory/hyperplastic polyps should also be differentiated from squamous papillomas, which have an exophytic, papillomatous surface and much less inflammation. Rarely, atypical inflamed glandular mucosa entrapped within the abnormal stromal cells can mimic adenocarcinoma. Giant fibrovascular polyp should also be differentiated from inflammatory fibroid polyps, which occur rarely in the oesophagus and appear similar to their counterparts elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract. Leiomyomatosis occurs mainly in adolescents and young adults as a marked, diffuse thickening of the oesophageal wall, with or without nodularity, and extending distally in some cases to involve the proximal stomach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".