MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402035240 · doi:10.1093/molbev/msae178

A Quantitative Computational Framework for Allopolyploid Single-Cell Data Integration and Core Gene Ranking in Development

2024· article· en· W4402035240 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Meiyue Wang, Zijuan Li, Kande Lin, Shusong Zheng, Y. G. Feng, Wan Teng, Yi‐Ping Tong, Wenli Zhang, Chenghong Liu, Hong‐Qing Ling, Yue‐Qing Hu, Yijing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Biology and Evolution · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaState Key Laboratory of Genetic EngineeringScience and Technology Commission of Shanghai MunicipalityInstitute of GeneticsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiologyRanking (information retrieval)Core (optical fiber)GeneComputational biologyEvolutionary biologyDevelopment (topology)Data integrationGeneticsInformation retrievalData miningComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polyploidization drives regulatory and phenotypic innovation. How the merger of different genomes contributes to polyploid development is a fundamental issue in evolutionary developmental biology and breeding research. Clarifying this issue is challenging because of genome complexity and the difficulty in tracking stochastic subgenome divergence during development. Recent single-cell sequencing techniques enabled probing subgenome-divergent regulation in the context of cellular differentiation. However, analyzing single-cell data suffers from high error rates due to high dimensionality, noise, and sparsity, and the errors stack up in polyploid analysis due to the increased dimensionality of comparisons between subgenomes of each cell, hindering deeper mechanistic understandings. In this study, we develop a quantitative computational framework, called "pseudo-genome divergence quantification" (pgDQ), for quantifying and tracking subgenome divergence directly at the cellular level. Further comparing with cellular differentiation trajectories derived from single-cell RNA sequencing data allows for an examination of the relationship between subgenome divergence and the progression of development. pgDQ produces robust results and is insensitive to data dropout and noise, avoiding high error rates due to multiple comparisons of genes, cells, and subgenomes. A statistical diagnostic approach is proposed to identify genes that are central to subgenome divergence during development, which facilitates the integration of different data modalities, enabling the identification of factors and pathways that mediate subgenome-divergent activity during development. Case studies have demonstrated that applying pgDQ to single-cell and bulk tissue transcriptomic data promotes a systematic and deeper understanding of how dynamic subgenome divergence contributes to developmental trajectories in polyploid evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Biology and EvolutionSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207