Privacy-Preserving Gaze-Assisted Immersive Video Streaming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immersive videos, also known as 360$^{\circ }$videos, have gained significant attention in recent years due to their ability to provide an interactive and engaging experience. However, the development of immersive video streaming faces several challenges, including privacy concerns, the need for accurate viewport prediction, and efficient bandwidth allocation. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive system that integrates three specialized modules: the Privacy Protection module, the Viewport Prediction module, and the Bitrate Allocation module. The Privacy Protection module introduces a novel approach to differential privacy tailored for immersive video environments, considering the spatial and temporal correlations in viewport and gaze motion data. The Viewport Prediction module leverages a crossmodal attention mechanism based on the transformer to predict user viewport movements by analyzing the complex interactions between historical data, video content, and gaze patterns. The Bitrate Allocation module employs an adaptive tile-based bitrate allocation strategy using an exponential decay function to optimize video quality and maximize user quality of experience. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed framework outperforms three state-of-the-art integrated frameworks, achieving an average QoE improvement of 21.61%. This paper offers substantial novelty in addressing privacy concerns, leveraging gaze information for viewport prediction, and utilizing underlying correlations between different features.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".