Human efferent ductules and epididymis display unique cell lineages with motile and primary cilia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous research has illustrated the role of cilia as mechanical and sensory antennae in various organs within the mammalian male reproductive system across different developmental stages. Despite their significance in both organ development and homeostasis, primary cilia in the human male reproductive excurrent duct have been overlooked due to limited access to human specimens. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize the unique cellular composition of human efferent and epididymal ducts, with a focus on their association with primary cilia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human efferent ductules/epididymides from five donors aged 32-47 years, were obtained through our local organ transplant program. Cell lineage specificity and primary cilia features were examined by immunofluorescent staining and confocal microscopy in the efferent ductules and the distinct segments of the epididymis. RESULTS: The epithelium of the human efferent duct exhibited estrogen receptor-positive cells with primary cilia, FoxJ1-positive multiciliated cells with numerous motile cilia, and non-ciliated intraepithelial immune cells. Notably, intraluminal macrophages, identified by CD163/CD68 positivity, were observed to engage in sperm phagocytosis. In all three segments of the human epididymis, primary cilia were found on the surface of principal and basal cells. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our research indicates that the human efferent ductules create a distinct environment, characterized by the presence of two types of ciliated cells that are in contact with immune cells. The discovery of sensory primary cilia exposed on the surface of reabsorptive cells in the efferent ductules, as well as on basal and principal cells in the epididymis, lays the foundation for complementary functional studies. This research uncovers novel characteristics exclusive to human efferent ductules and epididymides, providing a basis for exploring innovative approaches to male contraception and infertility treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".