MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402050094 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcae293

Cognitive outcomes following unilateral magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: findings from two cohorts

2024· article· en· W4402050094 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Julie Petersen, Georgia Gopinath, Nadia Scantlebury, Richa Tripathi, Cheryl Brandmeir, Silina Z. Boshmaf, Nicholas Brandmeir, Isabella J. Sewell, Peter E. Konrad, Agessandro Abrahão, Ann Murray, Benjamin Lam, Manish Ranjan, Clement Hamani, Jessica Frey, Camryn R. Rohringer, Melissa McSweeney, James J. Mahoney, Michael L. Schwartz, Ali R. Rezai, Nir Lipsman, David Scarisbrick, Jennifer S. Rabin

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersHarquail Centre for NeuromodulationNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsThalamotomyEssential tremorMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineCognitionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationFocused ultrasoundPsychologyAudiologyUltrasoundPhysical therapyRadiologyPsychiatryParkinson's diseaseDiseaseDeep brain stimulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Magnetic resonance–guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy is a neurosurgical treatment for refractory essential tremor. This study examined cognitive outcomes following unilateral magnetic resonance–guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy, targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus for essential tremor. The research was conducted at two sites: Sunnybrook Research Institute in Toronto, Canada, and West Virginia University School of Medicine Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute in West Virginia, USA. The study focused on cognitive changes at both the group and individual levels. Patients with refractory essential tremor completed cognitive testing before and after magnetic resonance–guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy at both sites. The cognitive testing assessed domains of attention, processing speed, working memory, executive function, language and learning/memory. Postoperative changes in cognition were examined using paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, as appropriate. Reliable change indices were calculated to assess clinically significant changes at the individual level. A total of 33 patients from Toronto and 22 patients from West Virginia were included. Following magnetic resonance–guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy, there was a significant reduction in tremor severity in both cohorts. At the group level, there were no significant declines in postoperative cognitive performance in either cohort. The reliable change analyses revealed some variability at the individual level, with most patients maintaining stable performance or showing improvement. Taken together, the results from these two independent cohorts demonstrate that unilateral magnetic resonance–guided, focused ultrasound thalamotomy significantly reduces tremor severity without negatively impacting cognition at both the group and individual levels, highlighting the cognitive safety of magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.706

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicNeurological disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207