MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402054102 · doi:10.1079/9781800623279.0023

<i>Drosophila suzukii</i>(Matsumura), Spotted-wing Drosophila / Drosophile à ailes tachetées (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

2024· book-chapter· fr· W4402054102 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Warren H. L. Wong, Annabelle Firlej, Steve J. Perlman, Tracy Hueppelsheuser, Debra L. Moreau, Justin M. Renkema, Pierre Girod, Susanna Acheampong, Chandra E. Moffat, Jacques Brodeur, Juli Carrillo, Michelle T. Franklin, Paul K. Abram

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrosophila suzukiiDrosophilidaeDrosophila (subgenus)BiologyWingZoologyDrosophila melanogasterGeneticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drosophila suzukii , spotted-wing drosophila, is an invasive pest in Canada that can lay its eggs into fresh fruits, unlike many of its close relatives. Larval feeding inside fruit causes the fruit to spoil prematurely. Some parasitoids have been found attacking D. suzukii larvae and pupae in regions that D. suzukii has invaded, including Asobara cf. rufescens in Canada. A parasitoid from Asia, Ganaspis kimorum , has the narrowest host range of the parasitoids identified in the native range of D. suzukii and has been approved for release in some countries. In 2019, an adventive population of G. kimorum and of another parasitoid, Leptopilina japonica , was detected in British Columbia, where research is now being conducted to determine if these parasitoids attack native species of Drosophila . The chapter also reviews the predators, pathogens, and use of sterile insect technique for biological control of D. suzukii .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCABI eBooksSame topicInsect behavior and control techniquesFrench-language works237,207