MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402057635 · doi:10.1061/9780784485569.067

Concrete Solutions: Repurposing Existing C76 Gravity Pipe to Save $1M and Costly Permitting Delays

2024· article· en· W4402057635 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRepurposingComputer scienceEngineeringWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The water surface elevation (WSEL) of the existing Highline Canal is approximately 20 ft above the WSEL of the existing San Tan Canal (STC), where the reclaimed water from the City of Mesa would be discharged, necessitating the design and construction of a low-head gravity pipeline of varying diameters. The alignment of the gravity pipeline crosses a spur of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) and Arizona State Highway 87. Near this crossing is a 350-ft segment of abandoned 24-in. C-76 concrete gravity pipeline housed in a steel casing and hydraulic modeling suggested that incorporating this abandoned pipeline into the alignment of the proposed low-head gravity pipeline was feasible. Unfortunately, the existing pipe condition is structurally inadequate. Repurpose the existing C-76 gravity pipeline and manholes with a Sprayed-in-Place pipe (SIPP) liner saved months, or years, of schedule delays, and upwards of a million dollars in permitting and construction of a new trenchless crossing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicComplexity and Algorithms in GraphsFrench-language works237,207