MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402058436 · doi:10.1061/9780784485590.027

York Durham Sewage System Forcemain Twinning Project (York Region Contract No. T-18-131)

2024· article· en· W4402058436 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brad Ryan, Yan Lan, Tyler Corcoran, Robert Ward, Tom Casher, Susan Hansler, Adam Lachhman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of Durham
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystal twinningMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The York Durham Sewage System (YDSS) was originally built in the 1980s as a single forcemain by the Province of Ontario and its ownership was subsequently transferred to the Regional Municipality of York in the 1990s. Local sewer systems throughout the Town of Newmarket (located in York Region) connect to the YDSS which then conveys effluent to the Duffin Creek treatment plant located approximately 60 kilometers (km) to the south. In 2016, York Region’s water and wastewater master plan identified that the YDSS was reaching capacity in the Town of Newmarket and required an upgrade. The resulting forcemain twinning project included the addition of a secondary forcemain. This upgrade was challenging as the new forcemain had to be installed through a dense urban environment and a floodplain of the East Holland River which runs north to south through Newmarket. Microtunneling installation of the 5.5 km long forcemain through Newmarket required 11 river crossings, 3 railway crossings, numerous street crossings, and work within and below city parks. The forcemain was installed in two passes. For the first pass, full face slurry microtunnel boring machines (MTBM) were used to install precast microtunnel pipe (casing pipe), manufactured to CAN/CSA A257.2 (ASTM C76). For the second pass, AWWA C301(E) prestressed concrete cylinder pipe (PCCP) was used as the carrier pipe and was installed and grouted in place within the casing pipe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207