MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

165 Creating a community fire safety and prevention toolkit with the national indigenous fire safety council, Canada

2024· article· en· W4402058787 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian Pike, Kate Turcotte, Samar Al‐Hajj, Brendan Smith, Len Garis

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFire safetyIndigenousResearch councilEngineeringCivil engineeringGovernment (linguistics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Indigenous communities bear a disproportionate burden of residential fire-related deaths and injuries compared to non-indigenous counterparts, posing a threat to community health and well-being. Lack of access to fire safety and prevention resources and effective programs contribute to the increased risk of fire-related injuries and deaths. <h3>Objective</h3> To develop a community resource for Indigenous and small communities interested in reducing the frequency and severity of fire incidents, and their associated injuries and deaths. <h3>Methods</h3> Development of this resource was based upon previous work to review fire safety and prevention evidence and practices, and to document the process of gathering information regarding Indigenous community needs concerning fire safety knowledge and research needs. Strategies were developed, contextualized, and refined though consultation and input from experts in the field of fire and injury prevention. An evaluation of the National Indigenous Fires Safety Council (NIFSC) community fire safety education programming assessed the evidence supporting each program. A level of evidence (LOE) score was based upon the amount available evidence and study designs, using a summary 5-star system to indicate the overall quality and level of evidence. <h3>Results</h3> The LEAD Fire Safety and Prevention Community Toolkit is a step-by-step workbook built upon four main strategies: Learn about community characteristics and fire burden; Engage with community members and build support; Assess available resources and identify opportunities; and Develop and implement fire safety and prevention action plan. It leads users through a process from learning about the community fire burden, to raising community support, to planning evidence-based and data-driven fire safety and prevention activities, to implementing the action plan and evaluating the results. The leading NIFSC programs promoted in the toolkit are the Home Safety Assessment, Smoke Alarm and Carbon Monoxide Installation, and Home Escape Planning. A set of indicators is included to document baseline community fire burden and prevention activities, and to evaluate the implementation, short-term outcomes, and long-term impact of the fire safety and prevention action plan. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This toolkit guides Indigenous and small communities to use best practices in reducing the frequency and severity of fire; those that are evidence-based, cost-effective, and efficient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstractsSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207