Confronting the Complexities of Large-Diameter Sewer Rehabilitation in a Highly Urbanized Setting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urbanized areas around the globe face an increasingly urgent need to rehabilitate aging sewer infrastructure. Challenging projects in dense neighborhoods have long been deferred for their difficulty and are now rising to the top of the list of priorities. The Boston Water and Sewer Commission (BWSC) is undertaking a multi-year, multi-phase program to rehabilitate one of its most critical sewer interceptors. The New Boston Main Interceptor (NBMI) conveys sewage and stormwater from more than 3,000 tributary acres, including downtown Boston and multiple other district neighborhoods. The 102-in. reinforced concrete pipe is experiencing significant corrosion from hydrogen sulfide gas. This paper focuses on the unique complexities faced in large-diameter sewer rehabilitations within a dense urban fabric—including working within congested utility corridors and major commuter transportation corridors, minimizing neighborhood impacts, and anticipating the needs of many stakeholders. The goal of this project is to achieve a robust structural rehabilitation solution while minimizing hydraulic impacts to the network, construction impacts to the neighborhood, and local traffic. Trenchless techniques are optimal for urbanized settings, because they minimize excavation which, in this case, would be an average 30-ft deep excavation along a major residential/commercial street and would cause significant neighborhood disruption. In this instance, sliplining and geopolymer application were the preferred rehabilitation methods for this vital venture due to the significant corrosion, large interceptor size, bypassing design, and barriers to excavation. By early 2024, Phase 1 rehabilitation will be completed, Phase 2 rehabilitation will be under construction, and Phase 3 design will be 50% complete. BWSC employed complex bypass strategies for varying flow conditions, adapted lining practices to suit this unique project (e.g., slipline grouting into a tight annular space and field measuring ovality of spray liner), minimized excavation and utility conflicts through the use of existing access points and structures, and minimized traffic impacts with a narrow work zone. We will highlight these and other strategies that can prove beneficial to owners and engineers undertaking similar rehabilitation efforts in highly urbanized settings worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".