MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402059564 · doi:10.1061/9780784485576.042

The Unique Rehabilitation of the Aurora Magmeter Bypass Sewer: Richmond Hill, Canada

2024· article· en· W4402059564 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eismat Abdalla, James Tustin, Jessica Garner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsRegional Municipality of Durham
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationAeronauticsComputer scienceEngineeringMedicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Owned and managed by the Regional Municipality of York, the Aurora Magnetic-Flow-Meter Bypass (AMB) stands as a subterranean, permanent sanitary bypass sewer situated at the southeastern intersection of Bloomington Road and Yonge Street within the confines of the Town of Richmond Hill. This vital infrastructure facilitates the essential upkeep and maintenance of the Magmeter, as and when needed. Recent assessments of the AMB have revealed a state of deterioration that demands urgent intervention to avert potential failure. In response, a comprehensive rehabilitation plan for the AMB has been conceptualized by Jacobs. This comprehensive plan encompasses the structural lining of a 43-m section of a sanitary sewer with a diameter of 1,050 mm, in addition to the rehabilitation of nine distinctively configured chambers. These chambers connected with the AMB include a pentagonal chamber and an L-shaped chamber. The latter is composed of three individual chambers seamlessly interconnected, yet distinctly separated by flow control components, such as sluice gates and stop logs. The intricate nature of this project is compounded by the presence of compact maintenance openings and the inclusion of a drop structure. The distinctive design of these chambers presented a formidable challenge during both the design and construction phases. Each chamber necessitated a tailor-made solution to address its unique characteristics and requirements. Of particular note is the fact that the existing flow control elements had ceased to perform their intended functions, thereby elevating the project’s complexity. A notable facet of the rehabilitation strategy was its conceptualization to be executed without resorting to the establishment of an above-ground temporary bypass system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207