MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402061220 · doi:10.1061/9780784485576.046

New Westminster Columbia Section Rehabilitation—Large Diameter Sliplining

2024· article· en· W4402061220 on OpenAlexaffabout
Justin Cheng, Farnaz Edalat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsBurnaby Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)RehabilitationComputer scienceMedicinePhysical therapyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metro Vancouver is responsible for the conveyance and treatment of wastewater for the Greater Vancouver area which is home to approximately 2.5 million residents. Sections of the wastewater conveyance system are reaching the end of their design life or have experienced accelerated degradation due to corrosive conditions. One such sewer is the New Westminster Interceptor (NWI) Columbia Section, which is a 1.6 km concrete sewer ranging from 1,067- to 1,524-mm diameter. Metro Vancouver has performed temporary repairs along the Columbia Section over the past 20 years. Jacobs was retained as the design engineer to develop a long-term solution and provided construction engineering services for trenchless rehabilitation of the NWI Columbia Section by sliplining the existing concrete pipe with new fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) pipe. This paper provides an overview of the project and presents a case study of the challenges as they relate to the Owner, Engineer, and various stakeholders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207